Japanese Schedule Postmarks
The fresh new numbers portray rule numerous years of the japanese Emperors. This type of leadership-year/Gregorian schedule conversions was strongly related prewar Japanese photo postcards (1900-1945):
With the laws and regulations created in more than area to possess Periods I-IV, it’s always clear and that rule months a postcard drops on the. Particularly, seasons “10” cannot be Meiji 10 (1877), as there were no visualize postcards when you look at the 1877. In the event your postcard is actually Period III (1918-1933) [this has a beneficial “ka” in the place of an effective “ga” inside the “hagaki”], next “10” means “Taisho ten” or 1921. But not, in the event the cards was Months IV (1933-1945), then it is “Showa ten” or 1935.
The quantity “7” around line tends to make a cards either 1918 (Taisho seven) or 1932 (Showa eight), all of and that get into Months III. As a whole, postcards regarding 1918 and you can 1932 was good enough additional with regards to lithographic tech, thematic stress, or other points to generate a determination it is possible to.
Gregorian Calendar Postmarks
The fresh written content was dated “Nov. dos,” therefore we can be infer that the “step 3.11” makes reference to step three November, and therefore the latest card was postmarked with the November step 3, 1923. This big date is actually similar to the Period III marks towards remainder of the cards.
Following statutes detailed above, we figure out that page are signed because of the a page-author named Nobuyuki for the Busan [“Fusan”], Korea toward December 10th, 1911. The newest card found its way to Shimonoseki, Japan on December 11th, plus in Kobe, The japanese into December 12th, and probably landed in the The brand new Bedford, MA, U . s . on January 11th, 1912. The fresh new light draw off “Meiji forty two” is visible from the postps container, revealing that a “normal” postmark has also been attached compared to that postcard additionally with our alot more “foreign” looks. [Read more…] about In so far as i see, there is nothing questionable about the dating measures proposed on foregoing